What You claim is "modern science" has no effective answers for people, and they do not treat chronic ReA with antibiotics. It is their position that the inciting agency created some kind of "immune imbalance."

No traction or attraction.

That's just the way it goes--we can disagree, but You try and present Your side as more substantial because it is backed by "modern science" when it is not. If You are not a political speech writer, You should be.