lexus/trina
has a very good point...something real important to remember...rheumies have a whole list of things to try...
everytime you try something new you have that great expectation that this one will actually help out what you want helped.
it sounds like you guys have been pretty much through the list...
many of these meds are real old in pharmacology terms...
sulfa was developed between the world wars as a topical antibiotic wound treatment( this was prior to the development of penecillin)...sulfasalazine (it does work for some) requires a huge dosage to be clinically effective, has about a 40%
'success' rate largely on peripheral stuff, also has a high rate of allergic reactions.
({vioxx, bextra, celebrex...were all adopted/adapted/extrapolated from sulfa)
methotrexate is a fifty's chemo therapy drug...very toxic to the liver, hard on the tummy...NAUSEA !!!! isn't gerd...
nausea is a fine natural reaction to poison...mtx works maybe 50/60% of the time, again largely for peripheral stuff.
arava is newer...like a high-end designer mtx, again very toxic to the liver...many of our folks have tried it and
moved on to biologicals...i can think of only two people who did well on it...and both have moved on to enbrel.
in the medical world a lot of insurance companies want you to FAIL on several/all of these 'less expensive' thingees
before they'll spring for the big bucks stuff...i don't think doctors do a good job telling the truth about the trip
down this garden path...the rheumy i dumped kept saying things like 'give it another month' ; it took my primary
care doctor to see allergic reactions...the rheumy said 'keep going' because these thingees take MONTHS to work.
i have discussed this subject with my current rheumy, and suggested that doctors ought to give probability
estimates and create reasonable expectations and remind ya that 'if it sux, call him/her and stop taking it'
only you can tell if you 'tolerate' a med...everyone's own experience is different...and while each story is different,
the common thread is that things as they are are not good and you're seeking relief...i look at the 'eat well', homeopathic,
accupuncture realm as 'perhaps, relief' ...fine...good...
but this is a progressive spondy monster, at a young age you're seriously discomoded; what are you doing to
prevent disease progression ? all the dmards of old and the biologicals of new have as their primary goal the halting
of the monster that's eating your bones inside out...accupuncture ain't gona do that...the RELIEF we seek is a by-product
of stalling the monster...that's why ya keep trying.
Failing a med, is disheartening, but it's not your failure, not a moral lapse; you did nothing wrong...It didn't work.
best
aB
