Dear Laura:
I have the same misgivings about banning Cody, and I do not like anybody being banned, however, he was not banished for his sophomoric humor or surly retorts, but for something he sent in private--to several members. Paul has offered to enlighten us, on an individual basis, as to what he received and I'm so sure that if I saw the material, I would agree with the collective decision, that I'm not even going to ask for it (obviously, this PM cannot be posted, but there is no proscription against sharing PMs via private methods). This forum should not really be used as a means to flame someone with impunity; we have a purpose that is much more important than individual egos and personalities.
There are no real guidelines about banning users--it is such a rare measure that should never have to be instigated. Use of kickas is a privilege and just like with any other, there are implied obligations. The rules for language are totally subjective and arbitrary and we may seem to over react at times, but in order to keep this site as uncensored (some places take days to post--after your entry has been reviewed) as it is, we have to use language and context that we would not hesitate having our own child of about 9 years old read. That precludes almost all jokes that are really funny...
If anybody wants to become an administrator, I'm sure that the rest of us would not mind the extra help, and for those who wish to help establish guidelines, we welcome your input.
Best Regards,
John
