banners
Kickas Main Page | Rights and Responsibilities | Donate to Kickas
Kickas Links
·HOME
·Forums Main Index
·Register!
MEDICAL CENTRE
·Medicine Contract
·AS Patient Guidebook
·Pain Map
·Disease Modification
·Ask your doctor
·AS and RA Papers
·AS Acronyms
DIET CENTRE
·London AS Diet
·Molecular Mimicry
·AS Dietary Primer
·AS Food Guide
SUPPORT CENTRE
·In Memorium
·KickAS Stories
·KickAS Banners
·Donations
Forum Stats
9933 Members
28 Forums
40219 Topics
488052 Posts

Max Online: 312 @ 11/11/12 01:26 PM
Newest Members
yarnivore, asroyer, Leona_Mccauley, LMS718, Phillip_McDowell
9933 Registered Users
KickAs Team
Chief Administrator:
Melinda (mig)
Administrator/owner:
John (Dragonslayer)
WebAdmin:
Timo (Timo)
Administrator:
Brad (wolverinefan)

Moderators:
- Tim (Dotyisle)
- Chelsea (Kiwi)
- Megan (Megan)
- Wendy (WendyR)
- John (Cheerful)
- Chris (fyrfytr187)

QR Code
If you want to use this QR code (Quick Response code) just save the image and paste it where you want. You can even print it and use it that way. Coffee cups, T-Shirts etc would all be good for the QR code.
Page 6 of 7 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >
Topic Options
#467400 - 04/15/12 07:10 AM Re: My progress report 8 / 4 / 2012 [Re: Philsta]
pspondylitis Offline
Journeyman_AS_Kicker

Registered: 03/18/12
Posts: 101
Originally Posted By: Philsta
Originally Posted By: pspondylitis
3. My personal opinion is still, that there could be some in this forum who are in natural remission and that they are unnecessarily suffering starch restriction. If that is the case, then such persons are really making life unnecessarily tougher than it should be. For them, my personal opinion is that they should try a starch challenge, and expect a flare soon after (within a week). Then they will know they are starch sensitive, and continue the diet. However,if after a week they remain flare free, then, perhaps they can quit the diet, and celebrate a natural remission of the disease.


I was also sceptical to begin with as usually I am the sort of person who trusts the medical community and would consider any 'alternative' treatments to be a load of nonsense and based only on the placebo effect.

However I was in a world of pain before I started the diet and would be willing to try almost anything within reason to reduce the pain. And the diet certainly did that! I have been on a low/no starch diet for about a year now and I have never felt better! Not only have I had no pain, but also less fatigue and less problems with my gut which were also regular before.

I have done as you said actually and came off the low starch diet twice now. The first time was during a holiday in Turkey where it was very difficult to stick to the diet. A week into the holiday I was in a world of pain again in by back, neck and hips. I barely had enough flexibility to put my shoes on, just as it was before I started the diet.

The second time was when last week I decided to test the waters again and added a bit of potato to my diet (the starch I miss the most!). I am paying for that now. Although it is only a low level of pain right now, I do certainly feel it in my hip and it is not pleasant. I am being extra strict again now to try and get back on track.

The diet works.

I would encourage you to persevere but of course nobody can force you to do that and I wish you all the best with whichever path you decide to take. But if you want to say that the diet does not work, then speak for yourself, not everyone else on here.


1. I have repeatedly spoken about MY diet attempt being a failure. This does not mean that the diet may not work for others.

2. However, there are others where , despite following the diet well, has had no impact. I particularly congratulate jroc for keeping excellent records of his attempt, and showing it does not work for him.

3. So there is a chance that some people could be better becoz of remission, not because of the starch the diet.

4. At the end of the day, there are many in this forum who are close minded, i.e. cannot accept anything other than that the starch diet is perfect, and feel that those who fail must be doing something wrong. I, and perhaps a few others are open minded enough to say, the diet may be working for some, but to others, it could be a natural remission.

5. I think we must agree to disagree. These arguments are leading nowhere, and causing too much unpleasantness to all concerned. I will try to not respond to posts, then this vicious cycle will hopefully stop.


Edited by pspondylitis (04/15/12 07:47 AM)
_________________________
Most likely psoriatic spondylitis. HLA - .

Top
#467402 - 04/15/12 07:49 AM Re: My progress report 8 / 4 / 2012 [Re: pspondylitis]
keit_nufc1 Offline
Second_Degree_AS_Kicker

Registered: 12/12/09
Posts: 210
Loc: Australia
My last words on the matter....sheesh!

We are all open minded!

Correct the diet may not work for all. But for those of us who have achieved success it has been through literally painstaking experimentation. Careful observation, meticulous record keeping and pain in the event of starch!

It worked like this for me...

1. 3 day fast to test diet hypothesis...on the 3rd day all sorts of "normalised pain" just disappeared.
2. LSD for a couple of weeks...weird all over pains disappeared, immediate reduction in chronic achilles swelling. However, SI joint still painful.
3. NSD...further improvements but SI joint still painful.
4. Paleo auto immune protocol (no eggs, seeds, nuts, sugar, alcohol etc...)...major break through.

I kept an open mind at all time. NSD wasn't enough for me. I kept experimenting with many many regressions. I can now eat eggs and mustard. However, my weakness for starch free dark chocolate and beer catches me out with iritis.

I am still learning. As we all are, well most of us!

Why are you so determined to prove those of us who experience success wrong? Why hypothesise random remission? Why not blame it on the cutlery? Or the moon? It is scientifically improbable that we have achieved temporary remission by chance, all at the same time and all excluding starch.

I repeat. The diet may not be a panacea. I accept that. But what you are proposing is some sort of symbolic register of reality that we all share, an illusion of remission divorced from sensory perception. Of course there are enormous limitations with the sensual register. After all the placebo effect is well known. But for many of us we have tested this effect by accident. Mysterious pain has led us to retest and investigate what we have consumed. The result? Starch has invariably crept in. At a conscious level we had no awareness of this incursion. However, at a sensory level we were notified. Pain, stiffness and general miserableness!

What is my take on the whole affair?

For what it is worth I believe that human beings share much commonality but display much difference. Illness and disease exist in a dialectic with genes and environment. Each auto immune disease is a perfect storm individual to the afflicted BUT with certain traces of commonality. So for me that means NSD was not enough in the early stages (the first 2 years). However, the guiding principles of the diet remain. I believe that my intestines display permeability. Lesions allow alien substances to pop up in all sorts of unwelcome places. The result is my body attacks the substance. Molecular mimicry, general all out attack on molecular invaders. Who knows! The result is last week I got irits because I ate too much starch free chocolate.

I could dismiss the NSD because of my iritis. Or I could draw on the experiences of others (KickAS, Robb Wolf, Loren Cordain, Kurt Harris and the growing myriad of evolutionary approaches to disease) and push on with further experimentation.

Or I could pursue other paths: medication, infusion, acupuncture etc...it the choice of the individual. However, I will not criticise or devalue the choices of others including yours. I chose herbs and diet based on research and self experimentation.

No hard feelings, but please try not to dismiss years of experience on this site.

All the best

Keith

Top
#467438 - 04/15/12 01:04 PM Re: My progress report 8 / 4 / 2012 [Re: keit_nufc1]
Alida1 Offline
First_Degree_AS_Kicker

Registered: 09/07/11
Posts: 160
Originally Posted By: keit_nufc1
My last words on the matter....sheesh!

We are all open minded!

Correct the diet may not work for all. But for those of us who have achieved success it has been through literally painstaking experimentation. Careful observation, meticulous record keeping and pain in the event of starch!

It worked like this for me...

1. 3 day fast to test diet hypothesis...on the 3rd day all sorts of "normalised pain" just disappeared.
2. LSD for a couple of weeks...weird all over pains disappeared, immediate reduction in chronic achilles swelling. However, SI joint still painful.
3. NSD...further improvements but SI joint still painful.
4. Paleo auto immune protocol (no eggs, seeds, nuts, sugar, alcohol etc...)...major break through.

I kept an open mind at all time. NSD wasn't enough for me. I kept experimenting with many many regressions. I can now eat eggs and mustard. However, my weakness for starch free dark chocolate and beer catches me out with iritis.

I am still learning. As we all are, well most of us!

Why are you so determined to prove those of us who experience success wrong? Why hypothesise random remission? Why not blame it on the cutlery? Or the moon? It is scientifically improbable that we have achieved temporary remission by chance, all at the same time and all excluding starch.

I repeat. The diet may not be a panacea. I accept that. But what you are proposing is some sort of symbolic register of reality that we all share, an illusion of remission divorced from sensory perception. Of course there are enormous limitations with the sensual register. After all the placebo effect is well known. But for many of us we have tested this effect by accident. Mysterious pain has led us to retest and investigate what we have consumed. The result? Starch has invariably crept in. At a conscious level we had no awareness of this incursion. However, at a sensory level we were notified. Pain, stiffness and general miserableness!

What is my take on the whole affair?

For what it is worth I believe that human beings share much commonality but display much difference. Illness and disease exist in a dialectic with genes and environment. Each auto immune disease is a perfect storm individual to the afflicted BUT with certain traces of commonality. So for me that means NSD was not enough in the early stages (the first 2 years). However, the guiding principles of the diet remain. I believe that my intestines display permeability. Lesions allow alien substances to pop up in all sorts of unwelcome places. The result is my body attacks the substance. Molecular mimicry, general all out attack on molecular invaders. Who knows! The result is last week I got irits because I ate too much starch free chocolate.

I could dismiss the NSD because of my iritis. Or I could draw on the experiences of others (KickAS, Robb Wolf, Loren Cordain, Kurt Harris and the growing myriad of evolutionary approaches to disease) and push on with further experimentation.

Or I could pursue other paths: medication, infusion, acupuncture etc...it the choice of the individual. However, I will not criticise or devalue the choices of others including yours. I chose herbs and diet based on research and self experimentation.

No hard feelings, but please try not to dismiss years of experience on this site.

All the best

Keith


And if I'm not mistaken Keith.....You are the reason I found KA....and I will never be able to thank you enough for that!!! Only 5 months but feeling so much better then when I first arrived.
_________________________
Where your mind goes your life follows

Top
#467456 - 04/15/12 02:27 PM Re: My progress report 8 / 4 / 2012 [Re: keit_nufc1]
SJLC Offline
Iron_AS_Kicker

Registered: 02/16/10
Posts: 1046
Loc: CA, USA
Originally Posted By: keit_nufc1
The result is last week I got irits because I ate too much starch free chocolate.

I could dismiss the NSD because of my iritis.


Ok this is a side-track, but it should be ok since the originator of this thread is no longer interested in it...

where do you get completely starch-free chocolate? Cocoa beans naturally contain some starch, some varieties having less than others, but chocolate processing techniques should be able to bring the level down or even eliminate it. Is this stuff advertised as special low-carb chocolate? Or is the starch merely below the detectable limits of home iodine tests?

Top
#467481 - 04/15/12 05:42 PM Re: My progress report 8 / 4 / 2012 [Re: SJLC]
keit_nufc1 Offline
Second_Degree_AS_Kicker

Registered: 12/12/09
Posts: 210
Loc: Australia
In Australia there are two chocolates that I have tested with iodine and appear to be clear.

Whittackers Dark Ghana 70%
Alter Eco 85% Dark Blackout 85%

You are probably correct. The starch levels are probably not detectable with iodine. I am pretty starch sensitive and I appear to be OK with these in moderation.

Oh, hi Alida. I am glad you are doing so well! It is great to hear. I benefited so much from the experimentation and write ups of KickAS to. It has been a life changer.

Cheers

Keith


Edited by keit_nufc1 (04/15/12 05:45 PM)

Top
#467482 - 04/15/12 05:59 PM Re: My progress report 8 / 4 / 2012 [Re: pspondylitis]
Kiwi Offline


Registered: 07/26/04
Posts: 1923
Loc: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally Posted By: pspondylitis

3. My personal opinion is still, that there could be some in this forum who are in natural remission and that they are unnecessarily suffering starch restriction. If that is the case, then such persons are really making life unnecessarily tougher than it should be.


Their choice. A lot of people find the NSD actually quite an easy and very healthy diet once they've adjusted to it. My husband and I certainly have no trouble with it after 8 years. In fact by the end of the first year it was plain sailing. People on the diet are not suffering because of it. As mentioned to you before...if you read around a bit on the main forum and also others such as NASS you'll see that natural remission of all symptoms is not very common at all. Symptoms may move around the body but they don't generally spontaneously all disappear by themselves. I know you probably wish it was the case (we all do) as no doubt you would love to experience it for yourself...wouldn't that be great? Probably not going to happen naturally though.

Originally Posted By: pspondylitis

For them, my personal opinion is that they should try a starch challenge, and expect a flare soon after (within a week). Then they will know they are starch sensitive, and continue the diet. However,if after a week they remain flare free, then, perhaps they can quit the diet, and celebrate a natural remission of the disease.


Believe it or not, you are not the first person to come up with this idea. EVERY SINGLE person who starts the diet and feels relief then goes on to test whether it really is the diet making the difference by reintroducing starch and seeing what happens. EVERYONE. It's just common sense, not something they need to be told to do. They continue with the diet because for them it is neccessary to maintain the reduction (read reduction, not always complete remssion) of symptoms. They prove for themselves it is not placebo. Certainly the ones who have been on it for years and years would not be experiencing a placebo effect. And even after 8 years, when my husband strays from the diet his symptoms increase drastically. He is not experiencing natural remission or placebo. Many people with success on the diet would not class themselves as being in remission either as usually there is still some level of symptom activity happening while on the diet. Therefore they are NOT experiencing a remission.

People on this forum who stick with the diet do so because they have proved to themselves over and over that it works for them and they have experienced what happens when they come off it. They don't just do the diet blindly and to suggest that they do is quite insulting to their intelligence.

Good luck with your search for relief.... I sincerely hope you find it.


_________________________
Chelsea smile


Top
#467488 - 04/15/12 07:24 PM Re: running a forum [Re: pspondylitis]
inkyfingers Offline
Silver_AS_Kicker

Registered: 04/08/09
Posts: 1489
Loc: Melbourne, Australia
Originally Posted By: pspondylitis
Some of you , understandably , have suggested I run my own forum, so i can do whatever i want there instead of troubling you here. Can someone suggest , what is the easiest forum platform to install and run. I have some non forum websites that i have with inmotion hosting. What i am scared of, is that, if the forum becomes successful, i might let people down but not being able to run it smoothly (e.g. I do not know how to write scripts /code etc). So far I have only basic knowledge of Dreamweaver. Any advice would be welcome. Thank you.


What an excellent idea!!!

Maybe try something like narcissus.org - unless some other empire builder has already taken that domain name...
_________________________
Louise

Top
#467489 - 04/15/12 08:01 PM Re: My progress report 8 / 4 / 2012 [Re: keit_nufc1]
jroc Offline
Commanding_AS_Kicker

Registered: 10/30/08
Posts: 682
Loc: New Zealand
Quote:
I could draw on the experiences of others (KickAS, Robb Wolf, Loren Cordain, Kurt Harris and the growing myriad of evolutionary approaches to disease


hi kieth, you might be interested to read some of kurt harris's latest thoughts on diet and disease.

"I believe loss of tolerance for eating just about anything (except obvious NADS like excess LA and huge amounts of fructose) is a sign of immune dysregulation in MOST cases. It definitely is a sign of immune dysregulation to have an allergy to beef, or shellfish, or rice (very common in Japan). I disagree with Dr. Ayer's on that point. Even IBS has been recently shown to be characterized by abnormal mast cell populations in the gut- the same cells mediating airway and skin allergies. Take the case of Wolf. Robb Wolf was not poisoned by wheat and saved by paleo. He was rather a victim of a particular disease of immune dysregulation- celiac disease - which was and is ameliorated BUT NOT CURED by a wheat free paleo diet. He must stay off gluten to stay in remission. He is not "cured". If he were he could eat wheat with impunity like I can (Yes, my tests for celiac were negative). In the same way, someone with Crohn's disease or AS is not being poisoned by starch feeding particular bacteria in the gut, they are victims of an abnormal immune response to gut bacteria macromolecules that we are supposed to be able to - are actually evolved to - tolerate. The GAPS diet or similar, if it works for IBD, is palliative and not curative. The idea that starch or even gluten are per se NADS is wrong." - Dr Kurt Harris



Edited by jroc (04/15/12 10:03 PM)
Edit Reason: quotation marks were confusing

Top
#467496 - 04/15/12 09:34 PM Re: My progress report 8 / 4 / 2012 [Re: jroc]
Kiwi Offline


Registered: 07/26/04
Posts: 1923
Loc: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally Posted By: jroc
Take the case of Wolf. Robb Wolf was not poisoned by wheat and saved by paleo. He was rather a victim of a particular disease of immune dysregulation- celiac disease - which was and is ameliorated BUT NOT CURED by a wheat free paleo diet. He must stay off gluten to stay in remission. He is not "cured". If he were he could eat wheat with impunity like I can (Yes, my tests for celiac were negative).

In the same way, someone with Crohn's disease or AS is not being poisoned by starch feeding particular bacteria in the gut, they are victims of an abnormal immune response to gut bacteria macromolecules that we are supposed to be able to - are actually evolved to - tolerate. The GAPS diet or similar, if it works for IBD, is palliative and not curative. The idea that starch or even gluten are per se NADS is wrong."



Hey jroc...you're kind of stating the obvious with the above comment. Everyone here knows the NSD is not a cure (I don't recall seeing that claim made anywhere recently) and we know the bacteria we have in our gut are supposed to be there. We also know that if remission is acheived it is diet induced only - ie come off the diet come out of remission so of course not a cure. It's been mentioned often that the NSD is a management tool for controlling AS symptoms...just like the meds.

I'm tired today and maybe I'm misreading what you are trying to say with your post.
All the best smile
_________________________
Chelsea smile


Top
#467497 - 04/15/12 10:01 PM Re: My progress report 8 / 4 / 2012 [Re: Kiwi]
jroc Offline
Commanding_AS_Kicker

Registered: 10/30/08
Posts: 682
Loc: New Zealand
hi chelsea, those are kurt harris's words and not mine. i was posting them for keith as he expressed an interest in the opinions of dr harris. there were quote marks but it would have been more obvious if it was all in one paragraph so i have changed it. i agree that nobody is claiming that NSD is a cure. hope that clears up any confusion.

Top
Page 6 of 7 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >



Moderator:  Dotyisle, Kiwi, Moderator 
Who's Online
1 registered (1 invisible), 20 Guests and 2 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Recent Posts
I know, I hurt like that too......
by CentralGAGal
05/24/13 05:53 PM
Uveitis again questions and FED UP
by Grumpyally
05/24/13 04:35 PM
Steam Roller Effect
by ouchpotato
05/24/13 03:29 AM
2 questions: Humira/WBC and Rotator Cuff repair
by rumble
05/24/13 01:36 AM
question on hand pain
by michiganmom
05/23/13 11:57 PM
Can't even find words to title this.
by aussiegirl
05/23/13 04:59 PM
Injectable MTX recall
by Possi
05/23/13 04:48 PM
(Views)Popular Topics
"FITNESS" TEAM! - All Physical Activity & Sports 8782840
Has anyone had Pedicle subtraction Osteotomy ? 351126
hmmm 272007
What to do about healthcare? Can it be fixed? 213148
THE STARCH CONTENT OF FOODS - THE LIST 154423
A.S and beds, What do you find best? 149706
User names revisited 141627
No/Low Starch Diet Success Stories 124957
Medicinal Marijuana 124611
OMG!!!! 123881