Simple Starch versus Resistant Starch? - 03/13/12 01:10 AM
Although I do not own Carol Sinclair's book I have gone through Erginger's papers and dont see any info looking specifically at resistant starch versus simple starches - which would be highly valuable information.
Simple starches are essentially just medium glycemic index sugars and could easily be feeding something like klebsiella (or other gut pathogen). Any undigested sugars such as glucose, fructose, etc, would of course provide the ideal fermentable material for klebsiella, and I know that many avoid lactose for this reason.
However both RS1 and RS2 (found in beans, etc) provide an excellent fermentable substrate for the production of butyrate and other beneficial SCFAs - acids that would in theory INHIBIT klebsiella growth.
Now in normally healthy individuals it has been proven that both RS1 and RS2 provide a fiber like component to the diet and can make a huge improvement in "gut permeability." Klebsiella in the gut alone should not produce an immune response as it would never enter the bloodstream - and in addition RS provides an almost ideal slowly digesting way to increase liver and muscle glycogen levels as well as supporting NADPH recycling of glutathione (our primary antioxidant).
Does anyone know if resistant starch is specifically been studied in its contribution to AS? I have no problem giving up simple starches and sugars, but resistant starch along with foods high in vitamin K has totally cleared up my intestinal issues and I would rather keep them in my diet if possible.
Simple starches are essentially just medium glycemic index sugars and could easily be feeding something like klebsiella (or other gut pathogen). Any undigested sugars such as glucose, fructose, etc, would of course provide the ideal fermentable material for klebsiella, and I know that many avoid lactose for this reason.
However both RS1 and RS2 (found in beans, etc) provide an excellent fermentable substrate for the production of butyrate and other beneficial SCFAs - acids that would in theory INHIBIT klebsiella growth.
Now in normally healthy individuals it has been proven that both RS1 and RS2 provide a fiber like component to the diet and can make a huge improvement in "gut permeability." Klebsiella in the gut alone should not produce an immune response as it would never enter the bloodstream - and in addition RS provides an almost ideal slowly digesting way to increase liver and muscle glycogen levels as well as supporting NADPH recycling of glutathione (our primary antioxidant).
Does anyone know if resistant starch is specifically been studied in its contribution to AS? I have no problem giving up simple starches and sugars, but resistant starch along with foods high in vitamin K has totally cleared up my intestinal issues and I would rather keep them in my diet if possible.